So what exactly is this ‘Photojournalistic’ photography you hear so much about and should you be requesting it for your wedding?
Bridal magazines have often highlighted this new trend in photojournalistic or fashion style wedding coverage as the coolest & best way to have your event photographed. Done well, it can wonderfully captures the emotions, relationships and events, planned or unplanned, of your wedding day as they unfold that the traditional photographic approach would often miss. This makes for a more emotional, realistic reliving of your wedding day when you look through your album, even years later. Done poorly, your photojournalistic (or “PJ” as it is referred to) images may be indistinguishable from the snapshots your guests took with their point & shoot cameras!
So what's the difference was between PJ and ‘candids’ that wedding photographers have always done?
Unfortunately, a lot of photographer have not learned this new art form so they pretty much just do the candids they have always done and call it PJ. They sound up to date but haven’t made the investment in education & equipment necessary to produce professional level photojournalistic images.
To dispel the confusion, here are the correct descriptions of each:
Then there is Traditional style where the photographer takes full control of location, lighting and poses for elegant portraits that take full advantage of your stunning dress, hair, veil and the facility or outdoor location you‘ve carefully chosen for your wedding.
So which style is right for you?
When we meet, we’ll discuss your style preferences and vision for your day as how you want your album too look. You may need 50% traditional and 50% PJ or maybe 80/20. I’ll adjust my photographic style to your needs and liking, moving back and forth as needed. For larger events where both styles are wanted, having a second photographer (Victoria) is recommended.